[Openal] OpenAL Soft 1.10 will be sooner than expected

[Chris Robinson]

On Sunday 01 November 2009 3:42:44 am Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Chris Robinson wrote:
> > I reverted the locking changes, but I redid it in a way that should be
> > better compatible with newer, unpatched Pulse libs.
> 
> The workaround works. Still that pulseaudio change looks wrong to me.

The change may or may not be wrong, but the behavior is right according to the 
docs. The main thing I'd say is wrong is that the callback is called 
synchronously, but given that it is, the signal call should block since it's 
told to wait for acceptance.

> Yes, great! I can can confirm that. Thanks!

Cool, thanks.