[Openal] Help compiling cvs checkout on 01/11/06

[Sven Panne]

Again, without more detailed info I can only guess here. I am not aware
of any visibility-support-detection problems. Note that enabling
visibility support in conjunction with -O2 (or inlining to be more
exact) can lead to *larger* executables. And as Prakash already
mentioned, configure chooses to use -g when GCC is recognized, but that
is nothing to worry about. The "size" command is the only relevant
measure.

Cheers,
   S. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openal-admin at opensource.creative.com 
> [mailto:openal-admin at opensource.creative.com] On Behalf Of 
> Prakash Punnoor
> Sent: Freitag, 13. Januar 2006 09:13
> To: Simon Su
> Cc: openal at opensource.creative.com
> Subject: Re: [Openal] Help compiling cvs checkout on 01/11/06
> [...]
> Yes, the autotools build fails to enable symbol visibility 
> support, but I wonder whether this is the only cause? YOu 
> could try to pass -fvisibility=hidden via CFLAGS to configure 
> and see whether now filesizes are alike.
> 
> Furthermore it seems autotools used -g (debug infos) and I 
> guess cmake not, which could be the main reason. [...]