[Openal-devel] OpenALsoft CPU usage?

[Chris Robinson]

On Saturday 06 June 2009 11:21:57 am Christian Ohm wrote:
> And I didn't want to imply that OpenAL Soft _needs_ to be optimized more. I
> tested 1.3 (the version that used the least CPU in my earlier tests), and
> while it does 42 sources at 13% CPU, it also chokes somewhere below 64
> sources. So current git is the best OpenAL Soft so far, and if it is
> released as it is and replaces 1.7 everywhere I'm quite happy with that.

I'll see about getting a release together sometime this weekend (today or 
tomorrow). There's some problems compiling the current code under MSVC, and 
I'd like to try to get them fixed in a reasonable way, but that's difficult to 
do without access to that compiler. It does compile under MinGW though, and 
Win32 binaries will be provided, so I don't know how important it would be for 
release.