[Openal-devel] Re: [Openal] ALubyte* -> ALchar*
Adam D. Moss
adam at gimp.org
Sat Dec 3 07:25:48 PST 2005
Sven Panne wrote:
> This is bad luck: Gentoo and Debian chose an unfortunate moment for an OpenAL
> snapshot, so they distribute an intermediate state of the headers somewhere
> between OpenAL 1.0 and OpenAL 1.1.
Something like this was likely to happen eventually -- we've
historically said 'pull from the trunk, it's always the most
stable'. You may remember an interminable thread some months
ago where I suggested [argued] that the 1.1 development happen
on a branch for this reason.
More information about the Openal-devel