[Openal-devel] Re: [Openal] ALubyte* -> ALchar*

[Adam D. Moss]

Sven Panne wrote:
> This is bad luck: Gentoo and Debian chose an unfortunate moment for an OpenAL 
> snapshot, so they distribute an intermediate state of the headers somewhere 
> between OpenAL 1.0 and OpenAL 1.1. 

Something like this was likely to happen eventually -- we've
historically said 'pull from the trunk, it's always the most
stable'.  You may remember an interminable thread some months
ago where I suggested [argued] that the 1.1 development happen
on a branch for this reason.

--adam